Moderated by Louis Tenebaum; 00:00 Tenebaum starts by introducing the topic of the panel, as well as the panelists; 03:48 Chatterjee begins the discussion by defining the term neutralism. He talks about the nations that have been neutral. 05:20 Chatterjee talks about how India is not neutralist and how different they are from other countries. He continues to talk about the lack of military alliances with India; 07:00 Chatterjee talks about permanent interests between countries versus allies and enemies that are never permanent; 09:20 Rafiqul-Islam Choudhury begins his talk. He begins his discussion about a scientist’s theory on neutralism [name of scientist unidentified]; 19:58 Ante Drndic begins his discussion. He talks about the policies of Yugoslavia; 27:05 R. Abdul Karim Sumitro begins his talk. He talks about the difference between military alliances versus ideological alliances; 28:20 Sumitro talks about Western democracy and totalitarianism; 32:35 Tenebaum asks the audience for questions; 33:10 Audience member asks Mr. Drndic why Yugoslavia maintains a large army when the money could be spent on other more beneficial means; :34:32 Audience member follows up with Drndic and asks if he thinks a Balkan war could exist between the two opposing powers; 35:26 Audience member asks Choudhury “what do you feel Pakistan really gains from the mutual security pact with the United States?â€; 38:20 Chatterjee also comments on the audience member’s question about the mutual security pact between the United States and Pakistan; 45:44 Choudhury responds to Chatterjee’s assertions from the previous question; 48:24 Chatterjee makes a quick comment and refuses to respond to Choudhury’s comments in order to get back on the topic of neutralism; 48:50 Audience member asks Choudhury if there really is neutrality, especially during times of peace versus war; 52:52 The conversation continues about the definition of a Free World and neutrality; 56:19 Audience member asks about American economic aid and how there is an appearance of “strings attached†to the aid versus Russian aid without the appearance of “strings attachedâ€; 58:37 Same audience member follows up and asks if there is a different attitude towards Russian aid; 01:00:30 Audience member asks if there is a suspicion of Russian aid similar to a suspicion with American aid; 01:00:50 Audience member asks if any members of the panel think there might be an alternative ideological viewpoint or positive ideological viewpoint for the future regarding neutrality; 01:05:25 Tenebaum closes the discussion and thanks the speakers.
description
Moderated by Louis Tenebaum; 00:00 Tenebaum starts by introducing the topic of the panel, as well as the panelists; 03:48 Chatterjee begins the discussion by defining the term neutralism. He talks about the nations that have been neutral. 05:20 Chatterjee talks about how India is not neutralist and how different they are from other countries. He continues to talk about the lack of military alliances with India; 07:00 Chatterjee talks about permanent interests between countries versus allies and enemies that are never permanent; 09:20 Rafiqul-Islam Choudhury begins his talk. He begins his discussion about a scientist’s theory on neutralism [name of scientist unidentified]; 19:58 Ante Drndic begins his discussion. He talks about the policies of Yugoslavia; 27:05 R. Abdul Karim Sumitro begins his talk. He talks about the difference between military alliances versus ideological alliances; 28:20 Sumitro talks about Western democracy and totalitarianism; 32:35 Tenebaum asks the audience for questions; 33:10 Audience member asks Mr. Drndic why Yugoslavia maintains a large army when the money could be spent on other more beneficial means; :34:32 Audience member follows up with Drndic and asks if he thinks a Balkan war could exist between the two opposing powers; 35:26 Audience member asks Choudhury “what do you feel Pakistan really gains from the mutual security pact with the United States?â€; 38:20 Chatterjee also comments on the audience member’s question about the mutual security pact between the United States and Pakistan; 45:44 Choudhury responds to Chatterjee’s assertions from the previous question; 48:24 Chatterjee makes a quick comment and refuses to respond to Choudhury’s comments in order to get back on the topic of neutralism; 48:50 Audience member asks Choudhury if there really is neutrality, especially during times of peace versus war; 52:52 The conversation continues about the definition of a Free World and neutrality; 56:19 Audience member asks about American economic aid and how there is an appearance of “strings attached†to the aid versus Russian aid without the appearance of “strings attachedâ€; 58:37 Same audience member follows up and asks if there is a different attitude towards Russian aid; 01:00:30 Audience member asks if there is a suspicion of Russian aid similar to a suspicion with American aid; 01:00:50 Audience member asks if any members of the panel think there might be an alternative ideological viewpoint or positive ideological viewpoint for the future regarding neutrality; 01:05:25 Tenebaum closes the discussion and thanks the speakers.
description
false